In the final analysis, I wonder if my desire to be surprised is outweighed by my desire to be right. Would I prefer the talented headcases to pull themselves together and grind out tough wins under pressure, or do I secretly relish seeing them cave in yet again, abject in a deciding tiebreaker after squandering match point? Under light interrogation, many fans insist that they’d like to see the prodigious youngsters break through against top players. But who can forgo the hot flush of satisfaction when the youngster loses to a top player by the almost clichéd score-line of 7-6 6-1?
I’ve no doubt that part of it is garden-grade Schadenfreude, the default setting for many who spend their lives on the internet. Beyond that, however, I suspect people derive genuine pleasure from those moments when reality conforms to the stories we tell about it. It feeds into our latent belief that character is destiny, even in tennis. I assume no one is dismayed to hear this; everyone, at some level, must relish the idea that their special area of interest is structured like a Greek tragedy.
Two results from yesterday clearly stood out in this respect. These were the losses of Nicolas Almagro and Grigor Dimitrov, to Tommy Haas and Novak Djokovic respectively. Each loss cleaved closely to the standard view of each man. Both permitted the self-avowed experts among us to nod knowingly, as though these matches couldn’t have played out any other way. Strictly defined, Almagro’s loss was more a comedy than a tragedy, although we shouldn’t hold that against it. Sometimes it’s good to laugh.
Almagro has so far had a mixed year, ‘mixed’ in this sense being a euphemism for ‘poor’ (‘year’ means pretty much what you’d think). There was of course that Australian Open quarterfinal in January, in which he failed to serve out the match no fewer than thirty-seven times (I’m going from memory here). Afterwards it was debatable whether he was more spooked at the prospect of finally defeating David Ferrer (on his thirty-seventh attempt) or of reaching his first Major semifinal.
After Melbourne, Almagro made his way to South America, to join the so called Golden Swing he has recently made his own. This sequence of otherwise inconsequential clay court events has become interesting in recent years for the way it perfectly showcases the pecking order in men’s clay court tennis. The first tournament in Chile, lacking top players, is entirely a lottery involving South Americans and second-tier Spaniards. Almagro typically shows up for the second event in Brazil, and commences winning until David Ferrer arrives and takes over. Two years ago Ferrer didn’t show up until the fourth tournament, which is Acapulco. Almagro consequently won Buenos Aires and Sao Paulo. Last year Ferrer showed up a week earlier, leaving Almagro with just Sao Paulo. This year the whole was thrown into disarray by the presence of Rafael Nadal from the get-go. This resulted in Almagro winning no titles at all, a dismal outcome from a portion of the season that is his best opportunity to shine, and earn.
Today Almagro lost to Haas after failing to serve out the match at 6/5 in the final set, and, more specifically, failing properly to dispatch a frankly hopeless drop shot from the German on the first match point. Admittedly, the drop shot landed on the service line and might conceivably have been an even worse lob – context suggests otherwise – which might account for Almagro’s indecisive disposal of it. He planted it cross court, and was as interested as everyone else to discover his opponent had anticipated this possibility, and arrived just in time to plonk the passing shot into the acre of open court. Haas, encouraged, subsequently broke back, and then compiled a tiebreaker that was almost perfectly unlike the one he’d lost to conclude the second set.
I don’t mean to belittle Almagro, since I find his game stylish and attractive. It was an excellent match, as virtuosic and dramatic as one could hope for, and the Spaniard provided almost exactly half its entertainment. Theatrically, Haas displayed a greater capacity for histrionics (racquet tosses, shirt changes, and pointless remonstrations with the umpire), although Almagro was better able to project to the back row. I won’t pretend I’m displeased that Haas won, since he’s nearly as old as me and he won’t be around for ever. But my point is that I was also not displeased that Almagro’s manner of losing seemed so perfectly characteristic, not to say comedic.
At about the same time Almagro and Hass were breaking their tie in the third set, Dimitrov and Djokovic were doing the same in their first set. From a strict chronological perspective, Dimitrov’s match thus ended about twenty minutes after Almagro’s. However, the loss occurred earlier. It happened as the Bulgarian served for the first set at 5/3, whereupon he set about confounding the persistent comparisons to Roger Federer. Federer would surely never serve four double faults to be broken back, but that’s precisely what Dimitrov did, proving emphatically that his spiritual progenitor is really Fernando Verdasco: He’s less Baby Fed than Baby Fer.
A tiebreaker ensued, which Djokovic won 7-4 (including one point that he graciously conceded). Dimitrov had led 5/2 in that first set, and hadn’t been all that far from 5-1. He made it to 5-1 in the second set, although he was sadly on the losing end by this time, and it was merely a prelude to going down 6-1. No one bothered to sound surprised as Djokovic galloped away with the match, especially among the Sky Sports commentators, who only briefly gave off excoriating Dimitrov in order to praise the world No.1’s professionalism.
They were hard to fault on both counts. Djokovic did everything he should have, right until the end, whereas Dimitrov only managed it for eight games. Once momentum has swung against them, it seems all but impossible for a young player to wrench it back, and instead they just spiral away. The score-line of 7-6 6-1 is a perfect illustration of this. It seems very common in these types of matchups. Once Djokovic had broken back – he afterwards admitted he hadn’t had to do much – even the contour of the result seemed grindingly inevitable. It felt like fate. It felt like a Greek tragedy, but not a very good one.
I every time spent my half an hour to read this web site’s articles or reviews daily along
with a cup of coffee.
Here iss a spot to test your sales funnel just before wasting money on it.
Here is a place you get the eyeballs regardless.
Also visit my web-site: cheap paid advertising (Shannan)
Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment (it was super
long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m
thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
Do you have any points for beginner blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate
it.
It’s no secret, instances arre rough.
Here is my website … online home business ideas 2014
Famtastic app This is the bomb!
my blog :: binary options demo accounts free
It discusses how socual media is utilized and if it uswd appropriately or not and how
it cann be.
Takke a look at my site – make money internet
I am sure this post has touched all the internet users, its really really pleasant article
on building up new website.
Hey this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting
to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you
have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but
have no coding know-how so I wanted to get advice from someone with
experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
If you’re still unsure, you might go to the product web
page and also see on your own.That will aid you make a decision.
Also viisit my blog: affiliate software
If some one wishes to be updated with most recent technologies then he must be go to see this web page and be up to date everyday.
Does your site have a contact page? I’m having
a tough time locating it but, I’d like to send you an e-mail.
I’ve got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.
Feel free to surf to my site :: plumbers
– 6 vitesses + fonction pulse – Blender 6 lames dont 2 crantees.
A comjmon mistake of neophytes is to possess a non-amended soil, which will
popel more problems into the future. Try to mow your grasses high to about 3 inches in height.
This meanns that you have to be sure you are able to take care of things like eaves and
sticks, but also trash that comes into your yard that you want to throw
away.
I enjoy reading through a post that will make people think.
Also, many thanks for permitting me to comment!
Set up a pan for paying your affiliates.
Stop by my web-site … affiliate marketing companies canada (Yvonne)
Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article.
I will be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post.
I will definitely comeback.
Feel free to surf to my homepage: Pro Binary Robot
Move on or Professional__________ $ 8,500___________________ Independent.
Credit unions, unlike banks, may have different and more
lenient conditions as well as rules about exactly
who they give loan to and whom they will attempt to give funding to.
If you want to purchase the login information reissued, it will take considerably
time and effort through then you might have forfeit
all your time.
Also visit my web-site … http://Facebook.com/
I got this web page from my pal who told me on the topic of this web page and
at the moment this time I am visiting this site and reading very
informative posts at this place.
Here is my web site – san diego criminal defense attorney